Will I love The Great War and Modern Memory?

Paul Fussell was a soldier in World War II, and he was also a professor of literature. His great book examines the way the experience of war changed a generation. It also changed literature (and art). After the experience of war, poets could no longer write about the world in idealized and romantic ways. They had to find forms to express the experience of being alive in ways that were new and shocking.

I love how Fussell uses his own experience of both war and scholarship to explain why Western art took such a turn in the 20th century. It… show more.

Who knew that a war could strike the human psyche so hard that those who survived did not have the words to describe it? The First World War was such an assault on innocence that new words were invented to write about it.

I love this book because it illustrates how language developed by looking at the writings of the soldiers in the trenches. War poetry is a special kind of writing, and that which came from the frozen mud fields in France between 1914 and 1918 is my favorite.

This is yet another book that convinced me that the… show more.

I am a huge fan of everything Paul Fussell (1924-2012) published. He was a colorful character in real life and earned his chops as a literary critic of modern war when he landed in France with the 103rd Infantry division in 1944, was wounded fighting in Alsace, and was awarded the Bronze Star and Purple Heart.

I couldn't put down his book. I find most important the universal way he describes the gap between the way common soldiers experience battlefields, in contrast to how the war is portrayed to the general public by observers at home, propagandists, and the like… show more.

This brilliant and original book is one of my favorites of any genre. It’s the perfect bookend to The Guns of August in that it illustrates the war’s effects on Europe’s people and culture, though the landscape it examines is literary and psychological rather than historical and political.

The war produced great literature because of the way it bridged the “old” complacent Europe with a “new” one that was pitiless and mechanized, Fussell posits. The effect of this sudden evolution constituted a psychological war-within-a-war for those who fought it. 

Writers such as Sassoon and Owen were able to let go… show more.

There’s a good reason this book remains current after so many years- quite simply, it is brilliant. It has all the grit and élan of a great and thoughtful writer who has seen combat. Fussell used the war of 1914 to articulate to American audiences what they needed to hear – that someone else appreciated the grim, visceral realities of warfare and loss, recognized the gap between rhetoric and reality, and understood the flood of irony it generated. As he admitted long after his best-selling book was published, The Great War in Modern Memory was “really about the Vietnam War… show more.

World War One did not invent irony, but the destruction of an entire generation’s innocence in the trenches of the Somme, Verdun, Passchendaele, and all along the Western Front, surely perfected it in an outpouring of war writings. Dedicated to the memory of a comrade at arms “killed beside me in France, March 15, 1945,” Fussell was a superb literary critic and creative scholar who fought and understood war. He also understood the need to depict it in literature. This renowned work of literary criticism about the British experience on the Western Front makes clear why this war, along with… show more.

Paul Fussell looks at the way British soldier writers – poets and memoirists – transmuted their experience of the First World War into literature, and how the picture they drew is the picture we still see when we think of the Great War. The irony and skepticism of authority which is classically modern starts here, Fussell tells us. His book is an extraordinary work of archeology and explanation – when you have read it, you understand yourself and the times we live in much better than you did before.