❤️ loved this book because...
The manuscript is an idea invented by the writer. The truth is that the quatrains were transmitted orally, but I prefer his choice. He added another dimension to the novel by making the manuscript itself its main character, instead of Benjamin and Omar Khayyam. The novel became like the Odyssey of the Samarkand manuscript. I also think that the aim of this invention was to find a way to connect the two stories that take one spatial framework, which is Persia and the East in general, while the time varies from the era of Omar Khayyam to the “modern” era. In this context, the writer hinted that events repeat themselves, even after a period of hibernation. A historical novel, even if some of its events are fabricated, but the writing style facilitates sorting, as the real events are linked to the years and in a language that distinguishes them from the drama of the fabricated events. For example, the main events of the Assassins' Resurrection, which frame the events mentioned and their circumstances, were true, as were the events of the Persian Constitutional Revolution in the second story - in a way that surprised me personally - amidst the siege of Tabriz and the intervention of the Russians and the British to deter popular demands.... The characters were, of course, imaginary, of course, other than the three heroes of the first story: Omar Khayyam, Hassan al-Sabah, and Nizam al-Mulk. However, their personalities, sayings, and their association were the result of the writer's creative intervention. As for the character of Jahan, it was inspired by the imagination (although it may have existed in reality) and was a link to connect Omar to the court of Nizam al-Mulk, Khatun, and Malik Shah. As for the second part, only the character of Jamal al-Din al-Afghani is real, while the rest, including the main character who was created of course to be the narrator of the events, are fictional people, but they are symbolic characters, so it is likely that those who resemble them in personality, orientation and destiny actually lived - but under different names.
This novel, which I finished in 5 days, gave me what I was looking forward to in the Granada Trilogy novel, which did not live up to my expectations: a historical novel in which the events that take place are historically correct - and the writer is free to invent details to build a plot through which he can convey what he wants to convey - in beautiful language (even if it is translated) and a vivid description of the scenes as if you were walking a knight on foot.
I loved Omar Khayyam and more than him Shirin, who disappeared as soon as the manuscript disappeared, as if she was nothing but a mirage inspired by the quatrains to Lesage, those quatrains that were lost in the sea, as it was written in them:
You ask where we get the breath of life,
If a long story should be shortened
I said that it springs from the depths of the ocean,
Then the ocean suddenly swallows her up again.
-
Loved Most
🥇 Immersion 🥈 Teach -
Writing style
❤️ Loved it -
Pace
🐕 Good, steady pace
1 author picked Samarkand as one of their favorite books, and they share why you should read it.
A gripping historical novel set in 11th century Persia that imagines the life of poet and philosopher Omar Khayyam
Accused of mocking the inviolate codes of Islam, the Persian poet and sage Omar Khayyam fortuitously finds sympathy with the very man who is to judge his alleged crimes. Recognising genius, the judge decides to spare him and gives him instead a small, blank book, encouraging him to confine his thoughts to it alone.
Thus begins the seamless blend of fact and fiction that is Samarkand. Vividly re-creating the history of the manuscript of the Rubaiyaat of Omar Khayyam, Amin Maalouf…
- Coming soon!